set_validator changes

src/datablock.cpp

@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ void datablock::set_validator(const validator *v)
 	}
 	}
 	catch (const std::exception &)
 	catch (const std::exception &)
 	{
 	{
+		m_validator = nullptr;
 		throw_with_nested(std::runtime_error("Error while setting validator in datablock " + m_name));
 		throw_with_nested(std::runtime_error("Error while setting validator in datablock " + m_name));
 	}
 	}
 }
 }

src/file.cpp

@@ -31,11 +31,32 @@ namespace cif
 {
 {
 
 
 // --------------------------------------------------------------------
 // --------------------------------------------------------------------
+// TODO: This is wrong. A validator should be assigned to datablocks,
+// not to a file. Since audit_conform is a category specifying the
+// content of a datablock. Not the entire file.
+
 void file::set_validator(const validator *v)
 void file::set_validator(const validator *v)
 {
 {
 	m_validator = v;
 	m_validator = v;
-	for (auto &db : *this)
+	for (bool first = true; auto &db : *this)
+	{
+		try
+		{
 			db.set_validator(v);
 			db.set_validator(v);
+		}
+		catch (const std::exception &e)
+		{
+			if (first)
+				throw;
+
+			// Accept failure on secondary datablocks
+			// now that many mmCIF files have invalid
+			// restraint data concatenated.
+			std::cerr << e.what() << '\n';
+		}
+
+		first = false;
+	}
 }
 }
 
 
 bool file::is_valid() const
 bool file::is_valid() const
@@ -125,7 +146,8 @@ void file::load_dictionary(std::string_view name)
 
 
 bool file::contains(std::string_view name) const
 bool file::contains(std::string_view name) const
 {
 {
-	return std::find_if(begin(), end(), [name](const datablock &db) { return iequals(db.name(), name); }) != end();
+	return std::find_if(begin(), end(), [name](const datablock &db)
+			   { return iequals(db.name(), name); }) != end();
 }
 }
 
 
 datablock &file::operator[](std::string_view name)
 datablock &file::operator[](std::string_view name)